Oppinions on Sterling Silver Flutes?

Flute History and Instrument Purchase

Moderators: Classitar, pied_piper, Phineas

Post Reply
wctesl
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:24 pm

Oppinions on Sterling Silver Flutes?

Post by wctesl »

I bought a Amadeus by Wm. S. Haynes and was wondering how sterling silver flutes compare to other flutes?

fluttiegurl
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 11:05 pm

Post by fluttiegurl »

It depends on the flute. Not the most direct answer, but it is very true. I flute that is constructed well not made of silver is going to outplay one that is solid and poorly constructed.

User avatar
pied_piper
Posts: 1962
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by pied_piper »

fluttiegurl wrote:A flute that is constructed well not made of silver is going to outplay one that is solid and poorly constructed.
That's quite true. It's also generally true that price is related to quality and generally speaking silver plated is the lower end of cost and quality and solid gold is the extreme upper end. A solid sterling silver flute is generally considered a better or pro quality flute, but as hinted by fluttiegurl, there are exceptions. There are some very good silver plated flutes and there are some not-so-good solid silver flutes. Any flute that is fully or partially handmade is generally better and more costly than mostly machine made flutes regardless of the material that it is made from. So again, it depends...
"Never give a flute player a screwdriver."
--anonymous--

User avatar
Phineas
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:08 am

Post by Phineas »

Here is a good answer.

Most players would consider a silver plated Muramatsu over a solid silver Gemeinhardt. Of course, this is very subjective, and does not mean that a Gemmy is a bad or low quality flute.

It as all about what the player prefers, and the over all flute design that counts. Not what the flute is made of or how much it costs. The process of making handmade flutes, and the caliber of the flute maker is the main reason why you see flutes that cost $3000+ USD.

Another issue is preference. I prefer flutes that project. I have found that Silver Plated/Clad flutes have better projection with the same headjoint. Different materials have different properties that someone else may find desirable for them. Headjoints also effect that sound of the flute. The Amadeus sounds similar to a Haynes because of the headjoint. The main difference between an Amadeus and a regular Haynes is how that keys feel.

I hope this helps.

Phineas
Last edited by Phineas on Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
vampav8trix
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: USA

Post by vampav8trix »

You can't really put a silver plated Muramatsu in the same catagory as a Solid silver Gemeinhardt because of the way the flutes feel.

I have owned both and the Muramatsu beats the Gem any day of the week.

That is my personal opinion.

User avatar
Phineas
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:08 am

Post by Phineas »

vampav8trix wrote:You can't really put a silver plated Muramatsu in the same catagory as a Solid silver Gemeinhardt because of the way the flutes feel.

I have owned both and the Muramatsu beats the Gem any day of the week.

That is my personal opinion.
I agree, I was just trying not to be a Gemmy basher. However I did prove my point :wink:

morningstar
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:36 pm

Post by morningstar »

Not meaning to hijack this thread :oops: ....but since we are on the topic of flute materials, I am wondering, and have always wondered, if anyone has opinions on the difference in materials for flute keys, especially between nickel silver plated keys and all sterling silver keys.

I've read somewhere that silver keys are more easily bent and hence easier for techs to do adjustments, it this true? But would this also affect the durability of the keys, e.g. you cannot press down too hard when playing.

I've also read someone (can't remember who) commented that the nickel/silver clad keys have a faster and lighter response, has anyone experienced this?

Just that the price significance between an all silver body with nickel keys vs an all silver body with all silver keys is quite great (e.g. the Muramatsu GX model vs DS model). We all know (although there are a lot of arguments about it) the significance in sound/tone/projection from an all nickel flute to a silver head/nickel body flute to a full silver body flute, so there's reason to pay more as we step up. But what about the next step-up, i.e. to an all silver flute including keys. If there's no significance in the way it plays, wouldn't I rather save a couple hundred to thousand of dollars by getting one with nickel keys? Or is it because we are paying for more meticulous worksmanship (the reasoning that as the flute contains more precious materials, more careful worksmanship and efforts being put in)

p.s. I'm comparing flutes of the same make here, not between different brands as we all know different brands have different qualities

User avatar
Phineas
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:08 am

Post by Phineas »

morningstar wrote:Not meaning to hijack this thread :oops: ....but since we are on the topic of flute materials, I am wondering, and have always wondered, if anyone has opinions on the difference in materials for flute keys, especially between nickel silver plated keys and all sterling silver keys.

I've read somewhere that silver keys are more easily bent and hence easier for techs to do adjustments, it this true? But would this also affect the durability of the keys, e.g. you cannot press down too hard when playing.

I've also read someone (can't remember who) commented that the nickel/silver clad keys have a faster and lighter response, has anyone experienced this?

Just that the price significance between an all silver body with nickel keys vs an all silver body with all silver keys is quite great (e.g. the Muramatsu GX model vs DS model). We all know (although there are a lot of arguments about it) the significance in sound/tone/projection from an all nickel flute to a silver head/nickel body flute to a full silver body flute, so there's reason to pay more as we step up. But what about the next step-up, i.e. to an all silver flute including keys. If there's no significance in the way it plays, wouldn't I rather save a couple hundred to thousand of dollars by getting one with nickel keys? Or is it because we are paying for more meticulous worksmanship (the reasoning that as the flute contains more precious materials, more careful worksmanship and efforts being put in)

p.s. I'm comparing flutes of the same make here, not between different brands as we all know different brands have different qualities
This is precisely why "flute science" does not work. Who cares! It really does not matter as long as you like it. Flutes are like anything else, they are only worth what people are willing to pay for them. That is the main reason for the price difference. The fact that even Japanese flutes in the "Professional" range are 2/3 the cost of US made flutes(Boston) with the same features. Handmade Taiwanese flutes are even cheaper. Chinese, even cheaper.

As far as any other factors, I can only say that the difference in flutes past a curtain price are at best nominal. I have played Miyazawas that were 2500USD, and I have played Miyazawas that were $12000USD dollars. I am sorry, but there was almost no difference playability wise. There were slight differences with projection, and tone color. The differences were not always better as the prices of the flutes got higher. I found some of the flutes at the higher end quite dark, and somewhat stuffy.

One last thing. Do not believe that hype. Almost all flute makers make good flutes based on their experience, not because they have degrees in acoustics. In other words, trial and error. There has been a lot of experimentation involved in creating "FINE" instruments. The only science involved is mainly meaurement(Physical, pitch, sound, etc.....) Only a player can tell if it plays good, and how the response is. Since everyone plays differently, this throws the science even further out the window.

There is a lot of science fiction out there. Some teachers, and players have a big mouth, and like talking down to people to prove they know everything. Do not sweat it. Just get what you like! How you wish to sound to your audience is all that matters in the end.

Just play the @#$% thang! If it dont play right, take it to the shop. Its that simple.

Phineas

User avatar
pied_piper
Posts: 1962
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by pied_piper »

In my experience, the material that a flute is made from does influence the sound. I say influence because the player can alter the tonal quality. I believe that in a masterclass James Galway was demonstrating that by saying that a gold flute sounds like this and then played a very dark sound. He then said this is what a silver flute sounds like and played with a brighter sound. If I tried to quantify this I would say that the sound produced is about 50% the flute and 50% the player (for a very experienced player).

If we look at the flute itself and ignore what the player can do to change to sound, IMHO I think that for the sound a flute produces, 80% of that sound is attributable to the headjoint and 20% is attributable to the rest of the flute. Also, I believe that each can be further broken down as follows:

HEADJOINT
30% - Tube
20% - Embouchure plate
20% - Riser
10% - Cut

BODY & KEYS
19% - Body
1% - Keys

Please keep in mind that this is my personal opinion and it is not based upon any scientific study. It is simply my observations while trying different flutes and headjoints.

So, IMHO, the keys have very little (if any) influence on what a flute sounds like. Now, nickle silver plated keys are a bit harder to bend than silver keys. HOWEVER, from the player's perspective, it makes no difference. While a light touch is desirable when playing, how hard a player presses a key makes no difference from the flute's perspective. Any player that presses a silver key hard enough to bend it is using WAY too much pressure. Try this test: Pretend for a moment that your left hand is a flute. Place your right thumb in the center of your left palm and the right fingers on the back of the left hand sort of like when you are playing the flute. Now begin to press your fingers down as if you were playing. If you are pressing hard enough to make your hand hurt, then you are pressing too hard. It would take far more pressure than that to bend a key by pressing too hard while playing.
"Never give a flute player a screwdriver."
--anonymous--

User avatar
Phineas
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:08 am

Post by Phineas »

pied_piper wrote:In my experience, the material that a flute is made from does influence the sound. I say influence because the player can alter the tonal quality. I believe that in a masterclass James Galway was demonstrating that by saying that a gold flute sounds like this and then played a very dark sound. He then said this is what a silver flute sounds like and played with a brighter sound. If I tried to quantify this I would say that the sound produced is about 50% the flute and 50% the player (for a very experienced player).
Ok, I can go for that. However I think you are giving the flute WAY too much credit. A good player will sound like a good player on ANY playable instrument, even a cheap one. Giving the flute 50% of the sound it produces would mean that a good player could not sound good on a cheap instrument. This is not true at all. I would say more 90%/10% in favor of the player. I would go as high as 98%, but you have to throw in a headjoint factor.
pied_piper wrote:If we look at the flute itself and ignore what the player can do to change to sound, IMHO I think that for the sound a flute produces, 80% of that sound is attributable to the headjoint and 20% is attributable to the rest of the flute. Also, I believe that each can be further broken down as follows:

HEADJOINT
30% - Tube
20% - Embouchure plate
20% - Riser
10% - Cut

BODY & KEYS
19% - Body
1% - Keys

Please keep in mind that this is my personal opinion and it is not based upon any scientific study. It is simply my observations while trying different flutes and headjoints.
I think you nailed it!
pied_piper wrote:So, IMHO, the keys have very little (if any) influence on what a flute sounds like. Now, nickle silver plated keys are a bit harder to bend than silver keys. HOWEVER, from the player's perspective, it makes no difference.
I think this mentality comes from the Saxophone realm. Saxophone pads are held to the keys with resonators. On a saxophone, the resonators effect the sound of the horn. I have found this to be true. I think this mentality has moved on the the flute realm. Go figure.

Phineas

fluteguy18
Posts: 2311
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:11 pm

Post by fluteguy18 »

There is a lot of GREAT information on this thread.

Different metals do indeed feel different when you play them, but studies are inconclusive on whether the metal itself yields certain acoustic properties.

I personally play a Miyazawa with a Sterling head with a nickle plated body and foot. When I was trying out flutes, I couldn't tell a big difference between the flutes with different amounts of silver in them [and even after attending the NFA conference the only two flutes I liked better in the showroom were a 10k gold Nagahara and a 14k Rose Gold Brannen]. I picked what I thought was best out of the lineup of flutes I had available to me, and the Sterling/Nickle silver flute won out. I was honestly expecting a pricetag of about $10-12k for the flute [it has all the bells and whistles], and to see a price tag of only $4.5k was a huge relief.

My thoughts on keywork materials:

If your skin is not very acidic, then it should not really matter that much. I think keywork doesn't really affect the way the flute plays unless it is of a much heavier material [like gold or platinum], but even then the influences are minimal and hard to pinpoint. My only thoughts about getting solid precious metal keywork is about your personal skin chemistry.

If your skin is more acidic [like mine], your skin oils will slowly eat through the plating. Silver is more resistant to these acids than Nickle Silver. So, once the plating is gone, the N.S. will deteriorate much more quickly. With my Miyazawa, I had a defective key and the plating was much thinner than standard. After about 8 months, the plating wore off on the key, and the NS began to get a pitted and pock-marked texture because of my skin chemistry. Seeing as my flute was still under warranty [and still is until February], Miyazawa paid to have my flute shipped to Japan to have the key replaced.

But if you have low Ph levels, you should be fine. I however have decided to get sterling keywork whenever my flute needs replacing.

User avatar
pied_piper
Posts: 1962
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by pied_piper »

Phineas wrote:Ok, I can go for that. However I think you are giving the flute WAY too much credit. A good player will sound like a good player on ANY playable instrument, even a cheap one. Giving the flute 50% of the sound it produces would mean that a good player could not sound good on a cheap instrument. This is not true at all. I would say more 90%/10% in favor of the player. I would go as high as 98%, but you have to throw in a headjoint factor.
Yeah, in retrospect 50/50 is probably weighted too heavy for the flute, but I don't think I would go as far as 90/10 for the player/flute. Maybe 70/30 or 80/20 would be closer to reality (for me anyway).

I can sound pretty good on a student or intermediate flute, but not near as good as on my sterling Muramatsu. Also, last year I visited JL Smith and tried out just about every headjoint they had in stock. I finally narrowed it down to 4 to take on trial. For my trial I chose these configurations: Sterling tube, sterling embouchure, 14K riser; Sterling tube, 14K embouchure, 14K riser; sterling tube, 14K embouchure, platinum riser; 14K tube, 14K embouchure, platinum riser.

While trying them, I also included my stock sterling headjoint in the mix. I had my wife listen from the next room as I randomly played them and asked her rank them from 1 to 5 for the best sound. I also tried them while blindfolded so that I didn't know what I was playing. In both cases when we compared our ranking, the 14K/14K/Platinum was ranked #1, the Sterling/Sterling/14K ranked #4, and my stock sterling Muramatsu ranked #5 (and I still think it sounds great, just different). For the #2 & #3 ranking, we differed on preference.

I bought the 14K/14K/Platinum...
"Never give a flute player a screwdriver."
--anonymous--

User avatar
sidekicker
Posts: 311
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:58 am
Location: Scottish-American in Oklahoma

Post by sidekicker »

fluteguy18 wrote:I personally play a Miyazawa with a Sterling head with a nickle plated body and foot. When I was trying out flutes, I couldn't tell a big difference between the flutes with different amounts of silver in them [and even after attending the NFA conference the only two flutes I liked better in the showroom were a 10k gold Nagahara and a 14k Rose Gold Brannen].
Just curious... Would that happen to have been the Brannen that I bought? :-)

SK

fluteguy18
Posts: 2311
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:11 pm

Post by fluteguy18 »

No it was a different one.... I think.... Maybe. I dunno. It was actually a 14k Brannen with Sterling silver soldered tone holes, and a 10k rose gold headjoint with a platinum riser. I can't remember if the G mech was inline or offset. I just remember mostly that I loved it, and that it was one of the few flutes I tried that actually turned heads when I played it.

User avatar
sidekicker
Posts: 311
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:58 am
Location: Scottish-American in Oklahoma

Post by sidekicker »

It was a different one then. Mine has gold (not silver) tone holes and rings. I didn't pay much attention to what head was on that flute because I already had my own gold head already that will be paired with it.

Post Reply